I believe it is commercial use, even if it is for re-sale and you have nothing to do with manufacture. In any case, do you really think MLB will spend any more of its high-paid lawyers' time recovering the $1.81 profit from Chuck, or similar amounts from you? It is my understanding, unless the law has changed in the last decade that profit is all they are entitled to recover from the unauthorized user. Of course they can get an injunction to make you stop selling them, but that is no worse than voluntarily stopping. Just my opinion.

Michael Siskin