Paul you wrote:
>>Why do you suppose the European nations, UN and the Middle East countries (sans Isreal) want Kerry to win.
What support can cite for the proposition that the European nations, UN and the Middle East countries (sans Isreal) want Kerry to win?
Or is it just okay to make up "facts" to support your conclusions (Say like claiming that Iraq is a threat to use WMD against the US).
You wrote
>>this country will eventually be overtaken by the radical Muslim terrorist soon after Kerry pulls our troups out of Iraq and delegates the power to rule Iraq to the UN.
What is the connection between radical Muslim terrorists taking over this country and our leaving Iraq? I don't see it. Maybe they'll overrun Iraq but I don't see how they will overrun the U.S. (and if they do overrun the U.S. how that relates to an Iraqi pullout).
you wrote:
>>will have no bearing on any of us if we are taken over by religous zealots who now control the greatest part of the worlds land mass and whose main purpose of existance to dominate the world.
Can you please cite your support for the proposition that the greatest part of the world's land mass is now controlled by religious zealots whose main purpose of existence is to dominate the world. I think think you have gone overboard with this claim. I look forward to see some evidence of this one.
you wrote:
>>if we still have a democracy at that time.
Why are you under the delusion that we have one now?
|