way, but I don't understand your point.

You said: "As I posted earlier in this thread, the policy you have stated here is NOT what it says on the club board."

What does your statement mean, especially since you placed an emphasis on the word "NOT"?

It implies that what I have posted is contrary to what is written on the Club's web-site. Was that your intent?

If so, then I have this response:

Club Policy for Member Usage of the Club's logo is not published on the Club's Website. The listing of member benefits only states that members are entitled to use the logo, but does nothing to state under what conditions, and believe me, there are conditions. Pretty much along the lines that I relayed as being the past policy.

Please understand, the subject of member usage of the Club's logo has quite a history, much of which has been hashed out on the Club's message board and is very accessible by going to the archives and searching on the word "logo".

One such hit produces this link:

http://www.ccgtcc.com/cgi-bin/mbarc01/webbbs_config.pl?read=11130

Which was a post made by Charles Kaplan in 2002, as follows:

"The Logo Usage committee is responsible for providing a guideline to the Board for the usage of the Club's logo by members, chapters, sponsors and others. The logo represents the Club and is an asset of the Club. It's use should be consistant and fair and in the best interest of the Club and the membership. The members of the committee are: Charles Kaplan, Robert Touts and David Feavel. Please watch for future posts about committee activities and a solicitation for member input on the guidelines."

I believe that the results of their efforts was, in essence, what I posted as being the past policy.

Now, if that was NOT your intent, then I really don't understand the purpose of your post. Could you please clarify it for me.

Thanks,

Jim Follis