Bob you aren't making sense. I am not in the same place, running and hiding, or following anyone anywhere. You are reading what you want to read.

Again - you, like Peter, want to avoid the issue of listing a garbeg, 60 cent chip as a "casino chip."

Bob, I don't really care what you think about me. When I see something I don't like or want to voice an opinion, I'll do it without regard for how you feel about it.

And there you go again, calling me a jerk. Why? because you don't agree with my position? Too bad - I don't care and to state it plainly, you have no issue in this post. You just can't resist jumping in to hear yourself talk.

Oh, so you have had issues with Peter as well huh? Join the silent chippers who fear his wrath Hey - this IS about Peter, his practices and his response to any who dare question him. His fragile ego can't seem to take any questioning at all.

There you go again, talking in circles. You want to confront someone I have a problem with, but you didn't do the same.

Contacted BCPD about a faulty laptop? That's pretty funny Bob. I'm sure they showed a lot of interest in a laptop in Colorado that wasn't working properly. I guess they had to struggle to keep a straight face while they took your report. I bet they still have a hard laugh over that down at BCPD to this day.

You issued a retraction because you came to your senses and realized I had nothing at all to do with whatever happened to your laptop.

You say that "the problem was definitely cause by the introduction of a corrupting influence from a source outside of my machine." Hey, given that description, it could be YOU.

If you know it was an "intrusion" why is it you can't seem to pinpoint what or who intruded the machine, its origin and what it did to corrupt the thing?

Again Bob, you talk a good game, but the facts say you're lame.

Later - TheGreyGhost