Hey Mike - I noticed that you didn't respond to a single question after jumping in and stirring the pot. I'm not ducking you, I left, I don't sit in front of the computer all day. Sorry

Come one now admit it - eBay's traffic is better than JPA's. eBay has the top sellers . . . .
I said up front my OPINION was the same as yours on volume, but I had no PROOF, YOU didn't supply ANY either, just opinions you call facts. I don't know what you mean by "Top Sellers" unless you mean volume, and again I would tend to agree but I have no proof do you? Maybe some of those 'Top Sellers' use JPA too. (I don't know.)

Come one now - don't try and get off the hook that easy after you asked for proof, I supplied it and then? What Hook?? You did not provide anything but more opinions, let's see numbers, stats, etc. not your opinions you CALL facts. I have sold chips on both eBay and JPA, in my experience eBay did not ALWAYS bring top dollar, sometimes I even got NO bids! I have NEVER had a chip go unsold on JPA. Your words The same chip will always sell for much more on eBay that it would at JPA. That statement is NOT ALWAYS TRUE. Again YOUR opinion.

Then you didn't answer a single question posed. It seems like that's your MO - you wanna talk a lot of garbage and nonsense, but can't seem to admit I was right. Mark, your getting wound up and on the fringes of name calling again. I went back and looked there is ONLY 1 question, check it out yourself. Just ONE question mark on the whole page..
You asked:
All the copy and paste items you listed all go to functionality of the site. The easier a site is to use, the more a user will visit. Can we agree on that statement?

Generally, I would tend to agree but that is not always the case and it is not based on fact but our opinions, sometimes the site you know HAS what you are looking for and deal with the hurdles to get there. Everything being equal then the user-friendlier site would attract more hits in my OPINION. Often I go to sites that are a pain in the ass, BUT I know they have what I am looking for and I know others do to. But as it applies to this discussion, I will give you that one in this case. BUT remember that was not the issue, Multiple log-ins in was the issue. Remember your long sarcastic post? Is THAT what you meant by “Constructive Criticism?” It was all about logging in repetitively. Right? Then Norm took a shot at you because of your final question Does anyone else find this annoying? It seemed to leave you open for a funny come-back. I think Norm was being funny, I laughed. Next you are being sarcastic again saying Hey - I just thought of a novel approach - why don't you actually fix it? More “Constructive Criticism?”

I do believe the log in thing is a nuisance, I would agree there. I do not agree your opinions or beliefs are facts, AND you have not shown where those “Facts” were supported. I would expect you to show that considering you are a stickler for the facts. You did do your research on the World Trade Chip story and show that.

Swallow hard and just get it over with - your ego can take it (I think). What's to swallow? I said what I think.

I'm waiting . . . .
Well, wait no more! There it is. BTW did you find anything to back up your claims? Remember, numbers, stats, etc.?