... Phyllis, but not vice versa.

>> If you're so concerned with accuracy, contact the Durham, NC
>> local paper, where the article originally appeared.

The Durham Herald-Sun may have printed the original letter ...

(I say "may have" because I still haven't been able to confirm even that and have my doubts -- the original version that I saw did not include the last five paragraphs contained in your version -- I suspect that the whole thing may be an internet fraud -- I emailed the editorial director of the paper late today requesting confirmation and hope he answers tomorrow)

... but they didn't post it here. For better or worse, you are accountable for that.

>> My opinions are my own and not your concern.

If you'll reread my response to your post, you'll see that I said not a word about your opinions. My "concern" was with the misleading and/or downright false factual assertions in the original letter.

----- jim o\-S