The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Archive 09

Jay, I disagree because
In Response To: Language (again) ()

"Shall" is something that is required to be done. Being "subject to" a penalty does NOT lessen the requirement that (in this case) either expulsion or other discipline be levied.
In our case a person "Shall be" "subject to" either expulsion or other discipline. IMO
Brien

P.S. Jay...I'm going to be looking for a $5 El Rancho Vegas chip while at the convention (the mustard color- cord mold) Any ideas?

Messages In This Thread

CHIP COLLECTING BAD BET FOR STATE GAMING WORKERS
It's regulations aimed at low level civil service
Re: It's regulations aimed at low level civil serv
Not only that .... 2 of the 3 are club members....
Shouldn't the word be "SHALL"
Yes, and No....
"SHALL BE CONVICTED OF A CRIMINAL OFFENSE"
Re: "SHALL BE CONVICTED OF A CRIMINAL OFFENSE"
Re: "SHALL BE CONVICTED OF A CRIMINAL OFFENSE"
Re: Yes, and No - How about
Re: Yes, and No - How about
THE WORD "OFFENSE" IS THE PROBLEM (ARCHIE)
Language (again)
Jay, I disagree because
Re: Language (again)
Re: CHIP COLLECTING BAD BET FOR STATE GAMING WORKE
Re: CHIP COLLECTING BAD BET FOR STATE GAMING WORKE
Government and common sense are an
Re: CHIP COLLECTING BAD BET FOR STATE GAMING WORKE
I agree...
Re: CHIP COLLECTING BAD BET FOR STATE GAMING WORKE
Re: CHIP COLLECTING the issue?

Copyright 2022 David Spragg