The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Archive 08

I have never suggested that ...
In Response To: Re: Your analogy ... ()

... >> ... these "non-genuine" brass core chips just magically appeared
>> and nobody produced them.... they just fell out of the sky.

Obviously, David made them and I have acknowledged that repeatedly. However, you said that he made them for the purpose of having dealers sell them as real. There is, as far as I know, no evidence to support that assertion. Do you know something that was not revealed in the brass core investigation?

>> Your painting of DW as some innocent person who is taking a bad rap is
>> preposterous and insults the intelligence of many of us who are reading
>> your continued defense of him and his descipcable actions ...

I have never said David is "innocent". What I have said -- and will continue to say as long as is necessary whenever the issue is raised (and please notice, it was not I who brought it up again) is that what he did does not violate any club rule or ethical provision and that, as a result, he cannot be the subject of sanctions by the club.

And my "defense" is not primarily intended to be of David as an individual, but of the fairness and integrity of our club's system of enforcing ethical standards. If we adopt a rule that we can throw out of the club anyone who does something we don't like, even if it isn't against the rules, then we will have a preposterous rule which insults the intelligence of fair minded people.

>> If DW did no wrong... I wonder why has he has been barred from
>> joining CC & GTCC and from attending the annual convention?

I don't know that he has been "barred" from the club. I still haven't been pointed to the board vote which made that decision. Most certainly, Nate does not have the authority to does this unilaterally.

>> I didn't make that decision Jim. Evidently some folks in authority
>> thought that action was appropriate ... which I concur with.

Even if you choose to respond to nothing else on this subject, Archie, please tell me:

Exactly which "folks" would that be?
When was that vote taken?
What was the vote?
Where has that decision been formally announced?

>> I know that you (and others) would like to drag this subject on into infinity.

I take offense at that, Archie. I'm not "dragging" this issue out at all -- for some time now, I have posted on this subject only in response to posts by others. It pains me that people I like and respect are so willing to simply ignore the rules by which we are supposed to be governed.

----- jim o\-S

Messages In This Thread

Chip ID Please: OLD Jetons
IMPORTANT - DO NOT HELP THIS GUY !!!!
Re: IMPORTANT - DO NOT HELP THIS GUY !!!!
Re: IMPORTANT - DO NOT HELP THIS GUY !!!!
An example of CABLEMANSAM's JUNK
Here is the text of the ...
Misleading Auctions
The only one being misleading ...
Another Example
Another example of text ...
Re: Another example of text .-But..
Re: Another example of text ...
Just got off the phone ...
Another Example ... Get the Picture
Got the picture ...
Also of Interest, the DW Connection
Re: Also of Interest, the DW Connection
Re: Also of Interest, the DW Connection
Your statements on this point ...
Re: Your statements on this point ...
I do remember that statement ...
Re: I do remember that statement ...
Re: Your statements on this point ...
Unless Ralph can say ...
Re: Unless Ralph can say ...
My point, Archie, is that ...
Re: My point, JIM, is that ...
Re: My point, JIM, is that ...
Re: My point, Peter, is that ...
Your analogy ...
Re: Your analogy ...
I have never suggested that ...
Re: Your analogy ...
Re: Your analogy ...
Janice, please see my replies ...
Neal, you were still on the board ...
Re: Chip ID Please: OLD Jetons
AT LAST - THE ? ANSWERED. THANKS, BOB. grin
Re: Chip ID Please: OLD Jetons

Copyright 2022 David Spragg