Now pete-

Spence vs the U.S government for factual accuracy -- I call that a toss-up (I chose Spence for moral accuracy at 20-1, but lawyers present facts that help their case).

Acquittal as proof that he didn't do what I claimed he did (open fire first) -- PETE PLEASE GIVE ME MORE CREDIT! All that shows is that it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt. That is no proof of innocense, and you insult me to imply that it is.