Jim wrote........

"ICG simply used the wrong logo in the ad."

Who proof reads the ads?

Also.....

"The club does not endorse private enterprises."

If that is the case then why was the ad allowed in the first place? Are you saying the Board was in the dark on this & John approved the ad?

I guess it would be easy enough to say it's too late & the damage is done, but I don't feel that way. At the VERY least the incoming Board needs to make it VERY clear in the next magazine that as you say....

"The board did not endorse ICG or the ad. and.....

"The club does not endorse private enterprises."

Andy - Las Vegas