The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Archive 04

Bob: sorry for very minor error; Look:

Bob,
So, I made a small error. No harm, I hope.
In my post above I said, in effect, the rules were always (1) chapter-member-must-join-national, then (2) since last year, the chapter member need not be a national member. So I was wrong, in my haste. Sorry. No big deal. This, I guess, is the correct time line: (1) the original constitution and bylaws of the club didn't mention chapters, maybe because there were no chapters at the start; then (2) for most of the Club's history the bylaws was chapter-member-must-join-national; and then (3) it was changed last year to chapter-member-need-not-be-national-member. (I think the Colorado chapter may have joined during the period when they did not have to have its members join the national, so the rug was maybe pulled out from under them when the rules were changed.)

I always knew this. It was in my web page that I have always had a link to. I said in part: "(3) THE DOCUMENTS AND HISTORY -- The Club constitution ( click here to view the constitution )
does not mention anything about chapters and individual chapter members. It is a short document
(good), and in Article 6 it authorizes the Board of Directors to create regulations and Bylaws to
carry out the purposes and affairs of the Club........... The Bylaws ( click here to see the Bylaws) are very
detailed respecting the chapters. The first Bylaws did not mention chapters. Then they required
that individual chapter members also be national members. Then, after a controversy over that, the
Bylaws were changed to their present stance -- that it is optional for individual chapter members to
be dues-paying national members. "

Here is the link to my statement, the same link that appears in the post where I made this slight error:
http://www.antiquegamblingchips.com/amend.htm

Bob, hope it is right this time.

best to all
Robert:

Messages In This Thread

DUES AMENDMENT -- WHY I AM VOTING "YES"
Robert, again it should be 'International...'
You lost your credibility in your 2nd sentence...
Bob: sorry for very minor error; Look:
One point worth emphasizing ...
Re: Your suggested suspension movement
Re: DUES AMENDMENT -- WHY I AM VOTING "YES&qu
Re: DUES AMENDMENT -- WHY I AM VOTING "YES&am
Re: DUES AMENDMENT -- WHY I AM VOTING "YES&am
Re: DUES AMENDMENT -- WHY I AM VOTING "YES&am
Not so.
VOTE NO NO NO
Re: I DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE COLORADO POSITION
OK, so what would you do?
Re: OK, so what would you do?
Time to rethink the Chapter thing...
Re: Time to rethink the Chapter thing...
Re: Time to rethink the Chapter thing...
Re: OK, so what would you do?
Re: OK, so what would you do?
Re: OK, so what would you do?
Re: Why not simply welcome them as guests ..
Re: Why not simply welcome them as guests ..
Re: Why not simply welcome them as guests ..
Re: Why not simply welcome them as guests ..
Re: Why not simply welcome them as guests ..
Re: Why not simply welcome them as guests ..
Re: Why not simply welcome them as guests ..
Re: Why not simply welcome them as guests ..
Re: Why not simply welcome them as guests ..
Re: Why not simply welcome them as guests ..
Re: Why not simply welcome them as guests ..
Here is ONE Chapter that already has!
Re: Here is ONE Chapter that already has!
Re: Here is ONE Chapter that already has!
GENE the web site owner has editted...
Re: Marv the web site owner has editted...
Re: You Are Kidding!!!
NOT MEL'S WEB SITE...
Re: NOT MEL'S OOPS
Disappearing messages... NOT MEL'S SITE
Re: Disappearing messages... NOT MEL'S SITE
Re: Disappearing messages... Is MEL'S SITE
Gene, I found it...
Re: Here is ONE Chapter that already has!
Re: Here is ONE Chapter that already has!
Re: Here is ONE Chapter that already has!
Re: OK, so Allan
Re: OK, so Allan
Re: OK, so Allan
Re: OK, so Allen
Re: My Reply... Bob
Re: My Reply... Archie
Re: My Reply... Bob
Re: My Reply... Archie
Re: My Reply... Bob
Thank you Allen, I agree
Re: Thank you Allen, I agree
You picked the right profession....
Re: You picked the right profession....
There is no such thing as "state" ...
Re: There is no such thing as "state" ..
I don't think so
Re: I don't think so
Re: Thank you Allen, I agree
Re: Thank you Allen, I agree
Re: Thank you Allen, I agree
Re: Thank you Allen, I agree
Re: Thank you Allen, I agree
I am voting "NO"...........
Re: I am voting "YES"...........
You're voting NO to give it all up?
John! As I said.......I voted "NO" (EOM)
Re: You're voting NO to give it all up?
Re: You're voting NO to give it all up?-Archie
Re: You're voting NO to give it all up?-Archie
Re: You're voting NO to give it all up?-Archie
Re: You're voting NO to give it all up?-Archie
Re: You're voting NO to give it all up?-Archie
Re: You're voting NO to give it all up? - Chuck
Huh?
We need more like you.
Re: Huh?
Re: I am voting "YES"...........
I voted "NO"...........

Copyright 2022 David Spragg