>>Your interpretation of my statements is inaccurate.<<

You wrote it, I quoted it, refuted it, you now backpedal. Take your foot out of your mouth instead of trying to eat it, it's much less painfull.

>>For example, stating the obvious that they are running as a team to gain voting control cannot be questioned.<<

.....clairvoyant speculation on why people agree to agree on ANYTHING will get you into trouble everytime. I already stated that these three people have differing ideas on a specific club issue that is important to me. My endorsement of Jim Reilly for president will not in any way guarantee that that issue will be ruled upon in my favor. You are showing ignorance of these people. It would do you some good to get to know them, because your words show that you don't.

>>But I think you would find a way to attack me no matter what I said.<<

I'll attack your words if I disagree with them, and back up my position. ......that's where me and you might be different.

Happy New Year,

Bob