The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Archive 04

Re: We're back to going to far....

Some interesting points have been brought up on both sides of the issue. I can seereasons that someone could be on either side. I think that for the club to ban something like slabbing is unfortunate. I agree that the free market should dictate, and we should be able to vote with our dollars. Only a handful (upwards of 50 as a basic guess)of people in the club have spent over $500 or $1000 cash for a chip. These are the people who would be most affected by slabbing. With 4000+ members, these 50 or so people will be left out as a silent voice. If a person only collects LE's or current house chips, why would they care about slabbing? Would people start charging $30 for a current $5 or $1 chip?

Archie mentioned that he lost interest for coin collecting when his specialty was adversely affected by slabbing. I personally lose interest in the club when people start talking of banning things. Why aren't fantasy chis banned from the convention? These have caused more harm up to this point then slabbing has! Please remember that many chips only exist in quantities for 1 or 2. Slabbing them has no bearing on the price! People will charge what people will pay. Sometimes dealers are happy to pack their chips home with them for the next show.

I have said it before, and I will make my position clear again. The only purpose of the club, in my opinion is to put out a magazine 4 times a year, and to hold a convention. Anything outside of this is not an issue that needs to be handled by the club.

This is only my opinion, and I feel strongly about it.

-John

Messages In This Thread

"Not banning them is the equivalent ...
Ban Them From the Club...
Re: Ban Them From the Club...
Re: Ban Them From the Club...
Re: Ban Them From the Club...
Re: Ban Them From the Club...
Re: Ban Them From the Club...
Re: Ban Them From the Club...
Well, that might be a little extreme ...
Re: "Not banning them is the equivalent ...
NOTICE -- I misread Peter's post ...
Re: "Not banning them is the equivalent ...
That a ban might be difficult to ...
Re: That a ban might be difficult to ...
Re: That a ban might be difficult to ...
Archie.......
Re:.... a long, from the heart response to Peter..
Re:.... a long, from the heart response to Peter..
Re:.... a long, from the heart response to Peter..
Defining a "slabbed chip" isn't that ...
Re: Defining a "slabbed chip" isn't that
We're back to going to far....
I understand your point, Bob ...
Re: We're back to going to far....
Re: We're back to going to far....
Re: We're back to going to far....
FWIW, John, I am one of the "handful" ..
Current slabbed Virginia quarters ...
Re: FWIW, John, I am one of the "handful"
Re: FWIW, John, I am one of the "handful"
Re: FWIW, John, I am one of the "handful"
Re: FWIW, John, I am one of the "handful"
Re: FWIW, John, I am one of the "handful"
Re: FWIW, John, I am one of the "handful"
Re: FWIW, John, I am one of the "handful"
Peter, I think you are missing ...
Re: Peter, I think you are missing ...
Re: FWIW, John, I am one of the "handful"
Re: FWIW, John, I am one of the "handful"
Re: FWIW, John, I am one of the "handful"
Re: FWIW, John, I am one of the "handful"
Re: FWIW, John, I am one of the "handful"
Re: FWIW, John, I am one of the "handful"
Re: FWIW, John, I am one of the "handful"
Re: FWIW, John, I am one of the "handful"
Re: FWIW, John, I am one of the "handful"
Re: FWIW, John, I am one of the "handful"
Re: FWIW, John, I am one of the "handful"
Re: Correction;
Re: FWIW, John, I am one of the "handful"
Re: Peter.....
The gloves are off now Archie.
Re: I never put them on, Peter.....
Re: FWIW, John, I am one of the "handful"
Re: FWIW, John, I am one of the "handful"
Not that it really.....

Copyright 2022 David Spragg