Andy - It's very easy to read in my posts that the
seller is wrong and that I'm not "on his side" -- or
on the "side" of any one else.. I've mentioned
there is no good reason for the seller to charge the
postage he did.... and it's quite obvious that I,
too, believe the seller's shipping method was not up
to par. All I've done was to respond to posts that
were directed to me, as I'm doing now with your
post9. I'm not "making Jim Reilly out" to be a bad
guy at all, as my purpose of these posts is to
express my opinion that four (4) negative feedbacks
for the sole purpose of one (1) package being
wrapped in a manner that Jim "assumed" and
"expected" would have been wrapped differently is
not a very good example to set as being normal
place. None of what I said (or quoted others saying
such as "wrong" and "heartless") was to make Jim
feel guilty for what he did, but to bring to others'
attention that what Jim Reilly did should not be
done by them so easilly and with pride.

I feel great reward that the count is 2 to 1
(according to Jim) in favor of what he did. I would
have been just as happy if only one person realized
what Jim did should not be done. I'm very content
with the outcome.

JB