The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Archive 03

Re: I disagree, Travis, risk of loss ...

John: the seller and the buyer are free to make a contract in which liability for non delivery rests with the buyer. But, and I may be mistaken about this, absent such a contract, the UCC would put the onus on the seller to deliver. I will look up the law on this [it's been a long long time since I studied or prascticed commercial law] but if some other lurking lawyer knows it, his/her contribution would be helpful.

I certainly agree that insurance for any high end item should be paid for by the buyer if the seller doesn't provide it but that doesn't mean the buyer is legally liable for non-delivery.

Messages In This Thread

GET A #*@&$#* LIFE!!!!
Re: I'm a good member?
Re: P.S.
Re: Treat people right!
Re: Treat people right!
Re: Treat people right!
Re: Treat people right!
Re: Treat people right!
Re: Treat people right!
But How Do You Really Feel? EOM
Re: GET A #*@&$#* LIFE!!!!
Re: GET A #*@&$#* LIFE!!!!
Re: GET A #*@&$#* LIFE!!!!
Re: GET A #*@&$#* LIFE!!!!
Re: A REASONED RESPONSE
I agree, Travis, risk of loss ...
Re: WHEN DO YOU TWO SLEEP?
Re: I disagree, Travis, risk of loss ...
Re: I disagree, Travis, risk of loss ...
Re: I disagree somewhat, John...
Re: Thanks for reminding me, Katie.
Re: Thanks for reminding me, Katie.
Re: Ha!! LOL! (EOM)
Re: Oh no! Not another...
Re: LOL...sounds good John...
No one wants to put you out of Business
Re:SEEMS TO ME..........
Respect for other's Point of View
Re: GET A #*@&$#* LIFE!!!!
Re: GET A #*@&$#* LIFE!!!!

Copyright 2022 David Spragg