... determines rarity, in my opinion, as explained at length in my post to Archie.

Any time we have two PEOPLE with differing opinions, each will "have an opinion that is not shared by all". Your "two lawyers at trial" comment was gratuitous.

My example did NOT say, or even imply, that there were 140,000 chip collectors. Just that if 2000 chips are issued, there is only one for each 140,000 people in the country (give or take a few).

"... using the word RARE with common chips is as stupid as ..." I couldn't agree more. As I said, however, "... the expression of an opinion can never
constitute a misrepresentation, no matter how uninformed or even stupid it might seem."

Please see my post to Robert Eisenstadt ----- are you willing to co-chair the committee? ----- jim o\-S