The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Archive 02

I disagree (short post)

I disagree. This exercise in sophistry brings to mind the old saw “a little knowledge is a dangerous thing........”

A lot of interesting and useful things can be written about scarcity and rarity.

All I can say now --and I think most would agree-- is that:

(1) in EXTREME cases we all know what is rare and common;

(2) defining everything one sells as “rare,” including things currently on the tables, old but plentiful, becoming obsolete in the past few years -- and currently sold by many dealers for several dollars-- and being informed repeatedly of these misrepresentations by knowledgeable collectors -- is a serious abuse; and

(3) persons committing such abuses should be warned, suspended and finally expelled from the Club (if they are members) and put on some Hall of Shame list.

Robert

Messages In This Thread

Rarity: Subjective/Objective (Long)
Re: Rarity: Subjective/Objective (Long) But well s
Re: Rarity: Subjective/Objective (Long) But well s
Re: Beau Rivage Rarity
Re: Beau Rivage Rarity
Re: How about "Very OLD"
Re: How about "Very OLD"
My opinion was not a defense ...
I disagree (short post)
I agree with your point 1 ...
Re: Rarity: Subjective/Objective (Long)
Supply, not demand ....
Re: Supply, not demand ....

Copyright 2022 David Spragg