It doesn't ruffle my feathers at all Andy. I would simply like to know why several of those otherwise well-meaning folks on-line seem to have to have instant answers to everything.... almost to the extent of demanding. I'm sure you know the answer to the question posed, as you live right there in Las Vegas and the rumor mill is alive and well in Vegas. Why not give Janice a call? It's not up to me to say what the vote was.... although I think I know. I heard it was 3-2, but that's not official until the club announces it..... and I hope it will be officially announced on the club message board. Does that make everyone happy? I don't know who voted for what, for certain, but I can make a pretty educated guess and figure it out..... as can most chippers. Who voted for what is not important to me..... the club membership elected officers to make these decisions. Obviously, Janice's vote was in the minority. That doesn't mean I don't consider her a dear friend of mine. By the way, I have no objection to the club disclosing who voted for what. It's the demanding tone from some posts that I object to. Am I not entitled to express my opinion on this board? If some don't care to read my posts, then skip over them when you see my name attached to them. It seems to me that President Sarles made it quite clear that he was not going to respond to inquiries on other than the club message board. Apparently that message has not gotten through to several of the more frequent impatient posters. The guy is on vacation.... whether you support his position, or support Janice's position. It does no one any good to choose up sides at this point in the club's development, and this early into the new terms of office. And that's my two chips worth.